Wikipedia... A source I use with caution... vs. the Nashville
Tennessean
This is partly to mention something I do in my
journo life, and partly to give a plug to a friend's blog. Mike Fumento is a
former paratrooper in the 82nd, one of the good guys that went to selection but
got injured, IIRC -- it happens. I've been enjoying his writing for some years
now -- Mike applies logic to various media feeding frenzies, much to the dismay
of the media sharks involved. The
Wikipedia angle comes in at this point. Many in the press are decrying Wikipedia because of an op-ed piece
by former editor John Siegenthaler that described how some JFK/RFK conspiracy
tin-hats savaged him (Siegenthaler) in a Wikipedia entry. (If you've been living
under a rock, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can register and edit; I
was briefly involved with it and edited some entries on special operations
personalities and 9/11 victims before I ran into the political buzzsaw that's
Wikipedia's volunteer editors -- a bunch of people who don't have jobs, which
means geeks living at home with mom and welfare moms snaffling Mallomars. You
can't put in some comment about a hero of World War II without it being twisted
by some rabid peacenik, so I gave up. Yeah, we just nuked the peace-loving Japs
for no reason. Have it your way. I use
Wikipedia from time to time as a secondary source, or to back up my memory when
I almost
remember a fact. But I trust it less than,
say, CBS Evening News.
Siegenthaler, for his part, didn't take the most
direct route to a corrected entry: register as a Wikipedia content editor and
correct the entry about himself. (Which makes me wonder how he got there. Are
there really people so vain they search for entries about themselves on the
internet?) Instead, he did what all Real Men of the Left do when their
reputation, manhood, or anything else negotiable is on the line: threatened to
sue. Then he ran into this problem: sue whom? Not many of the editors of
Wikipedia use identifiable names (I used "hognose" which anyone from the Army SF
or aviation communities would probably recognize). To actually sue somebody,
he'd have to sue John Doe and start subpoenaing records.
Siegenthaler's an old man. Subpoenas
take time. That isn't a propitious pathway for him. So instead he cranked up his
contacts at the McPaper (he was ed=page editor when USA Today had, and deserved,
that title) and wrote his fulmination.
Which caught Mike's eye, for he's been on the receiving end of a bit of
ad
hominem abuse from Siegenthaler.
We report, you
decide:Mike Fumento, "What
Goes Around, Comes
Around."John Siegenthaler,
"Should
Anyone Believe Fumento on
Anything?"Siegenthaler's
attack on "Michael Fumento, a man of many titles," was in response to a Fumento op-ed
dismantling a series of Nashville Tennessean stories that blamed pretty much all
disease in Tennessee on the Oak Ridge nuclear plant, something the
dependably-left Tennessean was, of course, against. The Tennessean's Series of
Doom hysteria appears to have hit print in the time before the event horizon of
the internet but we've all seen its shoddily-reported ilk (usually on the "TV
I-Team investigates!!" beat). Siegenthaler does manage to make a sideways
admission while Mike-bashing that "Without clear empirical evidence", there are
"some medical authorities and some scientists-highly qualified and
distinguished" that would "not waste a minute researching these cases." It's
almost an admission that there's no
there,
there. "But a newspaper thought it was worth
researching and studying." It would.
Posted: Friday - December 09, 2005 at 10:02 PM
|
Quick Links
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Aug 06, 2007 08:05 PM
|